Which came first, rabies or rabid creatures?
In terms of when they first appeared, rabies is
at least as old as vampires and werewolves.
Of course, this only means that they both appear in the earliest of
human writings. Rabies makes its way
into our earliest books of law, not long after the advent of writing. Rabies may be referred to in the Codex Eshnunna
of ancient Mesopotamia (1930 B.C.E.). A
more definitive reference, specifically noting a mad dog, is found in
the code of Hammurabi (1750 B.C.E.), still nearly 4,000 years ago. To be specifically mentioned when writing was
considered an essentially mystical creation meant only for demigod-like royalty
strongly indicates that rabies infection was already a very prominent fear and
a fairly common occurrence!
Rabies is well-documented within the pantheon of gods
and goddesses of the earliest written European cosmologies. Lyssa, the Greek goddess of rage - who has a
rabid dog crowning her head - certainly dates from earliest Olympian cosmology. The Romans had their own counterparts -- Ira,
Furor, and Rabies. Lyssa is perhaps best known for driving
Hercules (Heracles) to madness during which he murdered his wife and child. Many cosmologies have wolf gods, Fenrir in
Norse mythology and Wepwawet in Egyptian, but their raging characters are a
given rather than a unique excess that might be due to rabies infection. Of
course, with wolves it’s best to presume they are rabid.
We have already noted that a werewolf, King
Lycaon, is mentioned in Ovid’s Metamorphoses
from around 1 C.E. This story almost
certainly followed the lead of earlier oral traditions. Humans living and behaving like animals are
fairly common in Greek tales – Circe certainly did a number on Odysseus’s crew. But this jumbles lycanthropy into the
mix. Tales of werewolves exist, but are
generally just added in to tales of shape-shifting in general. Still, as King Lycaon’s tale attests,
transformation into a werewolf has a specific character, and a specific implication,
that is, the loss of social, civilized behavior, and of killing or turning new victims
Vampires, in their earliest form as revenants,
are clearly noted in folktales from earliest times. For historical purposes, these folktales were
perhaps best kept alive in Eastern Europe where pantheistic, pre-Christian beliefs
were still common at the same time the printing press was invented making
preservation of oral traditions a reality.
As the modern (since the Americas were discovered) view of vampires did not coalesce until Europeans
observed vampire bats (1600’s), it is difficult to directly or simply trace the
early conceptions of vampires. Many of
the words from which vampire has been derived may originally have referred to
witches. Witches could turn people mad,
or drove themselves into madness in search of mystical knowledge. A deeper analysis of the origin may not be
fruitful since vampires as we understand them almost certainly required the
discovery of vampire bats to take on their distinctive, singular persona.
In summary, rabies, werewolves, and vampires have coexisted
as far back as we can trace. This
doesn’t prove they are one and the same, but it is definitely consistent with
that notion. In concert with the
similarity of behaviors and the commonality of how they are passed from one
victim to another, it is almost impossible to deny their unity.
No comments:
Post a Comment